ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2024
Advances in bioadhesives for meniscal repair: A comprehensive review and criteria for the ideal candidate.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Tissue Crosstalk Regulating Meniscus Healing Under Inflammation and Physiological Loading.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Growth differentiation factor 5 improves meniscal healing in a pilot study on rats.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The latest studies agree that meniscal tears that require surgery should be repaired whenever possible to avoid early-onset osteoarthritis secondary to meniscectomy. Unfortunately, there are several limitations associated with meniscal sutures, making it difficult to put into practice the theory behind the concept of saving the meniscus. Meanwhile, there is an exponential growth in the use of tissue adhesives for surgery, but finding one suited to meniscal repair remains a struggle. This review has two main goals (1) to compile the various bioadhesives used in this field and (2) to list the criteria for an ideal meniscal bioadhesive. The review was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science in November 2023 without date restrictions. The inclusion criteria were: Studies published in English and focusing on meniscal repair using bioadhesives. The exclusion criteria were: Studies published in languages other than English. Adhesives used in combination with sutures, as the aim was to determine the adhesive's capabilities for meniscal repair alone. Synthetic adhesives such as polycyanoacrylates, polyethylene glycol, polyurethanes, and polyesters. Among the 11 bioadhesives found, fibrin is the only one that has been studied in humans. There are advantages and disadvantages to all the bioadhesives identified but none that fully meet the requirements for meniscal repair. The anatomy of meniscal tissue is complex and poses unique challenges that are compounded by arthroscopic stresses. The future of meniscal repair probably lies in combining the advantages of several bioadhesives, and this area should be the focus of future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.