Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800532›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2024

Exploring RAS mutation incidence and temporal heterogeneity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients - a single-institution experience utilising circulating tumour DNA.

George Zarkavelis, Anna Lea Amylidi, Nanteznta Torounidou, Melina Yerolatsite, Athanasia Keravasili, Varvara Keramisanou, Davide Mauri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Treatment outcomes of patients with BRAFContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

George Zarkavelis *Society for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), Ioannina, Greece.
Anna Lea Amylidi *Society for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), Ioannina, Greece.
Nanteznta TorounidouDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Melina YerolatsiteDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Athanasia KeravasiliDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Varvara KeramisanouDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Davide MauriSociety for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health challenge, ranking among the leading causes of neoplastic mortality. Despite transformative therapeutic advances, a considerable proportion of patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease, and 15-30% of those initially presenting with early-stage CRC eventually experience recurrence. Comprehensive molecular testing, especially the evaluation of microsatellite instability and mutations in KRAS/NRAS or BRAF genes, is essential upon diagnosis of stage IV disease, guiding treatment decisions. Material and methods: This manuscript explores the mutational landscape of KRAS and NRAS in patients with CRC, employing digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) BEAMing for the detection of mutations in liquid biopsy. Our study enrolled patients with histologically confirmed CRC and stage IV disease, focusing on identifying mutations in KRAS and NRAS genes during various stages of therapy. Results: Evaluating baseline, midline, and progression samples, we found that 66.6% maintained consistent mutational status post-disease progression, while 33.3% exhibited a shift in mutational status. The application of techniques with high sensitivity, such as BEAMing Digital PCR, is pivotal for accurate circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) mutation detection. The study underscores the significance of continuous molecular monitoring in guiding therapeutic decisions for patients with metastatic CRC. Conclusions: Our findings contribute to our understanding of the evolving mutational landscape and the potential clinical implications of ctDNA ana- lysis in the era of personalised cancer medicine.

Indexed as

circulating tumour DNAliquid biopsymetastatic colorectal cancermolecular monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38800532
PMCPMC11117156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.