Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800518›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2024

Reanalysis of Immunopeptidomics Datasets Provides Mechanistic Insight into TAPBPR-Mediated Peptide Editing on HLA-A, -B and -C Molecules.

Arwen F Altenburg, Jack L Morley, Sophia M Decatris, Jens Bauer, Juliane S Walz, Louise H Boyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arwen F AltenburgDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, CB2 1QP, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5361-4909
Jack L MorleyDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, CB2 1QP, UK.
Sophia M DecatrisDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, CB2 1QP, UK.
Jens BauerDepartment of Peptide-based Immunotherapy, Institute of Immunology, University and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Juliane S WalzDepartment of Peptide-based Immunotherapy, Institute of Immunology, University and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Louise H BoyleDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, CB2 1QP, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3105-6555

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Major histocompatibility class I (MHC-I, human leukocyte antigen [HLA] class I in humans) molecules present small fragments of the proteome on the cell surface for immunosurveillance, which is pivotal to control infected and malignant cells. Immunogenic peptides are generated and selected in the MHC-I antigen processing and presentation pathway. In this pathway, two homologous molecules, tapasin and TAPBPR, optimise the MHC-I peptide repertoire that is ultimately presented at the plasma membrane. Peptide exchange on HLA class I by human TAPBPR involves the flexible loop region K22-D35, with the leucine at position 30 (L30) involved in mediating peptide dissociation. However, our understanding of the exact molecular mechanisms governing TAPBPR-mediated peptide exchange on HLA class I allotypes remains incomplete. Methods: Here, in-depth re-analyses of published immunopeptidomics datasets was used to further examine TAPBPR peptide editing activity and mechanism of action on HLA class I. The role of the TAPBPR editing loop in opening the HLA class I peptide binding groove was assessed using molecular dynamics simulations and a peptide exchange assay. Results: We show that TAPBPR shapes the peptide repertoire on HLA-A, -B and -C allotypes. The TAPBPR editing loop was not essential to allow HLA class I to adopt an open state but did allow for the HLA-A*68:02 peptide binding groove to stay open for a sustained period. L30 in the TAPBPR editing loop was typically sufficient to mediate peptide repertoire restriction on the three HLA class I allotypes expressed by HeLa cells. TAPBPR was also able to load peptides onto HLA class I in a loop-dependent manner. Conclusions: These results suggest that the TAPBPR editing loop is involved both in peptide filtering and loading.

Indexed as

antigen presentationediting loopHLA-Iimmunopeptidomicsmolecular dynamic simulationpeptide editingTAPBPR

Identifiers

PMID38800518
PMCPMC11126903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.