Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800457›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2022

Functional network antagonism and consciousness.

Athena Demertzi, Aaron Kucyi, Adrián Ponce-Alvarez, Georgios A Keliris, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Gustavo Deco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Preservation of anticorrelated brain networks predicts recovery after traumatic brain injury.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Editorial: Focus feature on consciousness and cognition.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Athena DemertziPhysiology of Cognition, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, GIGA Institute (B34), Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8021-3759
Aaron KucyiDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-0028
Adrián Ponce-AlvarezCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-7392
Georgios A KelirisBio-Imaging Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-1261
Susan Whitfield-GabrieliDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Gustavo DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-7583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous brain activity changes across states of consciousness. A particular consciousness-mediated configuration is the anticorrelations between the default mode network and other brain regions. What this antagonistic organization implies about consciousness to date remains inconclusive. In this Perspective Article, we propose that anticorrelations are the physiological expression of the concept of segregation, namely the brain's capacity to show selectivity in the way areas will be functionally connected. We postulate that this effect is mediated by the process of neural inhibition, by regulating global and local inhibitory activity. While recognizing that this effect can also result from other mechanisms, neural inhibition helps the understanding of how network metastability is affected after disrupting local and global neural balance. In combination with relevant theories of consciousness, we suggest that anticorrelations are a physiological prior that can work as a marker of preserved consciousness. We predict that if the brain is not in a state to host anticorrelations, then most likely the individual does not entertain subjective experience. We believe that this link between anticorrelations and the underlying physiology will help not only to comprehend how consciousness happens, but also conceptualize effective interventions for treating consciousness disorders in which anticorrelations seem particularly affected.

Indexed as

AnticorrelationsConsciousnessFunctional connectivityIntegrationNeural inhibitionSegregation

Identifiers

PMID38800457
PMCPMC11117090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.