ReviewCureus2024
The Frequency of Anatomical Variants of the Bile Ducts: A Review Based on a Single Classification as Support for Cholangiographic Examinations.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal analysis of the learning curve for pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy in a low-volume transplant center: a comparative cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Redefining precision in biliary surgery: a paradigm shift from operative mastery to prognostic-driven strategy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complications arising from hepatobiliary surgery can have adverse effects on both the quality of life and the survival of patients. Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) techniques are highly effective at revealing anatomical variants of the bile ducts and thus play a vital role in minimizing the occurrence of complications. The aims of this review are threefold: to ascertain the classifications utilized for categorizing anatomical variants of the bile ducts, to present the reported results on the prevalence of these anatomical variants, and to explore the diagnostic modalities employed to visualize these anatomical variants and associated complications during surgical procedures. A review of the literature was carried out using the Cochrane Library database and the PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), and Google Scholar platforms. We conducted a comprehensive review of relevant studies to categorize the different anatomical variants according to the Huang classification. According to the Huang classification, our study showed type A1, 60.44%; type A2, 11.76%; type A3, 11.73%; type A4, 5.47%; type A5, 0.26%; and type B, which was identified in insignificant numbers (0.16%) or does not appear; additionally, variants that do not fit into the Huang classification have also been identified (10.18%). The Huang classification serves as an invaluable presurgical guide, aiding in the strategic planning of biliary interventions and effectively reducing the risk of iatrogenic complications, morbidity, mortality, and postoperative length of stay. MRC is still considered the noninvasive gold standard method for evaluating the bile ducts and their anatomical variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.