ReviewCureus2024
Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota (REBYOTA) in Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-scale metabolic modelling identifies vaginal microbiome members as potential probiotics.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiota in the Hepato-Cardiorenal Axis: Microbial Metabolites, Inflammation, and Emerging Therapeutic Targets.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Animals: Therapeutics, Conservation, and Farming.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- PREVENTION OF HEALTH CARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS IN U.S. HEALTH SYSTEMS: HARNESSING THE GUT MICROBIOME TO COMBAT INFECTION.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2025Review
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Induced by Wumei Pills Improves Chemotherapy-Induced Intestinal Mucositis in BALB/c Mice by Modulating the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Signaling Pathway.Current drug delivery · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) are a leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, and recurrent infections are common despite effective antibiotic treatments. Recurrent CDI causes a significant burden to the patient and healthcare system, which has led to efforts to find an effective treatment to prevent recurrent CDI. Recent studies have shown the efficacy and safety of orally and rectally administered microbiota treatment to prevent recurrent Clostridium difficile. This study systematically reviewed the data on the efficacy and safety of RBX2660 (REBYOTA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.