ArticleCureus2024
Prevalence of Refractive Errors Among Medical Students of Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Epidemiology of refractive errors and its associated factors among medical students.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Refractive errors (REs) are on the rise among medical students due to the high academic pressure of long hours of reading and their association with close technology. Uncorrected REs cause impaired vision and blindness with considerable morbidity. Documenting the prevalence of REs among medical students helps with early detection and appropriate remedial measures to prevent eye morbidity. Aim The aim of the study was to find the prevalence of REs among medical students at Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences, a medical institution in Raichur City, Karnataka, India. Methodology This hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted with a total of 425 medical students. An examination of the eye for REs was carried out using a streak retinoscope. The REs were noted in myopia <-0.5 diopters (D), hypermetropia >+0.5 D, and astigmatism >0.5 cylinder D. The data was statistically subjected. Categorical measurements have been presented as frequency (percentage). The chi-square test was applied to the association between the parameters. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Among the 425 observed participants, 160 (37.6%) subjects had REs. Among the REs in the total population, myopia 78 (18.4%) was the most prevalent, followed by hypermetropia and astigmatism, both with 41 (9.6%) and 41 (9.6%) prevalence, respectively. Gender-wise and age-wise, myopia was highly prevalent in both genders and in all age groups except the 20 years age group. Conclusion The prevalence of REs in our study among medical students is a matter of concern, although it is less compared to other previous studies in different geographical areas of India. Regular checkups, early detection, and immediate treatment are very important to prevent further ocular complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.