Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800186›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Perceptions and Experiences of Healthcare Providers and Patients Towards Digital Health Services in Primary Health Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kumaragurubaran P, Trupti Bodhare, Samir Bele, Vijaya Ramanathan, Thendral Muthiah, Gavin Francis, Ramji M

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Digital Pain Assessment: Patient and Family Perspectives.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kumaragurubaran PDirectorate of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, District Health Office, Madurai, IND.
Trupti BodhareCommunity & Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Madurai, Madurai, IND.
Samir BeleCommunity Medicine, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, IND.
Vijaya RamanathanAnatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Madurai, Madurai, IND.
Thendral MuthiahCommunity Medicine, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, IND.
Gavin FrancisCommunity Medicine, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, IND.
Ramji MCommunity Medicine, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health has the potential to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by supporting health systems and enhancing health promotion and disease prevention. However, obstacles such as restricted internet access, inadequate technical assistance, clinical resource disparity, and insufficient user training can impede the utilization and growth of digital health. Researchers should examine healthcare providers' and patients' perspectives to identify challenges and enhance usability. METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted among women health volunteers, staff nurses, and patients who used the VinCense mobile application (MedIoTek Health Systems Private Limited, Chennai, India) to record vital signs. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to evaluate participants' sociodemographic characteristics, perception of digital health monitoring, and patients' attitudes toward digital health monitoring devices. The data were analyzed using R programming, Version 4.3.3 (www.r-project.org). A multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes of patients toward digital health monitoring.

resultsThe study involved 27 healthcare providers and 406 patients. The majority (66.6%) of healthcare providers found the device convenient and efficient. Around 74.1% faced technical difficulties like internet connectivity and device battery issues. Among patients, 79.8% were satisfied with their digital health monitoring experience, 86.2% found device usage comfortable and 78.1% expressed satisfaction with health education and feedback. Around 354 (87.2%) patients stated that technology has improved healthcare, and 326 (80.3%) said that health technologies have improved ease. The results indicate that female gender (p=0.00), age above 50 years (p=0.04), and occupation status as a semiskilled worker (p=0.03), skilled worker (p=0.00), and clerical/shop/farmer (p=0.01) were statistically significant and associated with the positive attitude for digital health monitoring.

conclusionsThe digital health monitoring experience was found satisfactory by both patients and healthcare providers. The mobile health (mHealth) has tremendous potential for enhancing patient health. Therefore, it is advisable to contemplate an expansion of the VinCense mHealth Platform and other digital solutions to improve service delivery in primary healthcare setups.

Indexed as

digital healthhealthcare providersmhealthpatientsprimary health carewomen health volunteers

Identifiers

PMID38800186
PMCPMC11116918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.