ReviewCureus2024
Nuclear Cardiology in the Era of Precision Medicine: Tailoring Treatment to the Individual Patient.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The neuronal imaging in cardiology: 123I-Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Volatilome and machine learning in ischemic heart disease: Current challenges and future perspectives.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Determining the Multivalent Effects of d-Peptide-Based Radiotracers.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Imaging in the Era of Precision Medicine: Insights from Advanced Technologies - A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear cardiology, employing advanced imaging technologies like positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), is instrumental in diagnosing, risk stratifying, and managing heart diseases. Concurrently, precision medicine advocates for treatments tailored to each patient's genetic, environmental, and lifestyle specificities, promising a revolution in personalized cardiovascular care. This review explores the synergy between nuclear cardiology and precision medicine, highlighting advancements, potential enhancements in patient outcomes, and the challenges and opportunities of this integration. We examined the evolution of nuclear cardiology technologies, including PET and SPECT, and their role in cardiovascular diagnostics. We also delved into the principles of precision medicine, focusing on genetic and molecular profiling, data analytics, and individualized treatment strategies. The integration of these domains aims to optimize diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic interventions, and prognostic evaluations in cardiovascular care. Advancements in molecular imaging and the application of artificial intelligence in nuclear cardiology have significantly improved the precision of diagnostics and treatment plans. The adoption of precision medicine principles in nuclear cardiology enables the customization of patient care, leveraging genetic information and biomarkers for enhanced therapeutic outcomes. However, challenges such as data integration, accessibility, cost, and the need for specialized expertise persist. The confluence of nuclear cardiology and precision medicine offers a promising pathway toward revolutionizing cardiovascular healthcare, providing more accurate, effective, and personalized patient care. Addressing existing challenges and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial for realizing the full potential of this integration in improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.