Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800110›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Prolonged use of nomegestrol acetate and risk of intracranial meningioma: a population-based cohort study.

Pierre Nguyen, Noémie Roland, Anke Neumann, Léa Hoisnard, Thibault Passeri, Lise Duranteau, Joël Coste, Sébastien Froelich, Mahmoud Zureik, Alain Weill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Medroxyprogesterone acetate and meningioma: a global issue.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pierre NguyenEPI-PHARE Scientific Interest Group (French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products, and French National Health Insurance), Saint-Denis, France.
Noémie RolandEPI-PHARE Scientific Interest Group (French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products, and French National Health Insurance), Saint-Denis, France.
Anke NeumannEPI-PHARE Scientific Interest Group (French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products, and French National Health Insurance), Saint-Denis, France.
Léa HoisnardEpiDermE Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics, EA7379, Paris Est Créteil University (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Thibault PasseriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France.
Lise DuranteauDepartment of Medical Gynaecology, Bicêtre Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Saclay University, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Joël CosteBiostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Sébastien FroelichDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France.
Mahmoud ZureikEPI-PHARE Scientific Interest Group (French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products, and French National Health Insurance), Saint-Denis, France.
Alain WeillEPI-PHARE Scientific Interest Group (French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products, and French National Health Insurance), Saint-Denis, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) is a synthetic potent progestogen. This study aimed to assess the risk of intracranial meningioma associated with the prolonged use of NOMAC. Methods: Observational cohort study using SNDS data (France). Women included had ≥ one dispensing of NOMAC between 2007 and 2017 (no dispensing in 2006). Exposure was defined as a cumulative dose >150 mg NOMAC within six months after first dispensing. A control group of women (cumulative dose ≤150 mg) was assembled. The outcome was surgery (resection or decompression) or radiotherapy for one or more intracranial meningioma(s). Poisson models assessed the relative risk (RR) of meningioma. Findings: In total, 1,060,779 women were included in the cohort (535,115 in the exposed group and 525,664 in the control group). The incidence of meningioma in the two groups was 19.3 and 7.0 per 100,000 person-years, respectively (age-adjusted RRa = 2.9 [2.4-3.7]). The RRa for a cumulative dose of more than 6 g NOMAC was 12.0 [9.9-16.0]. In the event of treatment discontinuation for at least one year, the risk of meningioma was identical to that in the control group (RRa = 1.0 [0.8-1.3]). The location of meningiomas in the anterior and middle part of the skull base was more frequent with exposure to NOMAC. Interpretation: We observed a strong dose-dependent association between prolonged use of NOMAC and the risk of intracranial meningiomas. These results are comparable to those obtained for cyproterone acetate, although the magnitude of the risk is lower. It is now recommended to stop using NOMAC if a meningioma is diagnosed. Funding: The French National Health Insurance Fund (Cnam) and the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) via the Health Product Epidemiology Scientific Interest Group EPI-PHARE.

Indexed as

MeningiomaNomegestrol acetatePharmacoepidemiologyProgestin

Identifiers

PMID38800110
PMCPMC11127190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.