ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India
Cost-effectiveness of the prevention of parent-to-child transmission guidelines of HIV in India.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Projected impact of fast-tracking of anti-retroviral treatment coverage on vertical transmission of HIV in India.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One of the modes of transmission of HIV infection in India is from mother-to-child. In 2014, Prevention of Parent-to-child Transmission (PPTCT) guidelines of HIV in India were implemented which included shifting from Option A to Option B and B+. The aim of the present study was to evaluate health and cost related outcomes after implementation of these new guidelines. Methods: A decision analytical model was used to compare the PPTCT Option A with the new WHO Option of B and B+. Transmissions in serodiscordant couples and infants at 18 months were considered as health outcomes. The estimation of the cost for PPTCT services and HIV treatment was done using Costing Tool for Elimination Initiatives (CTEI) developed by National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM). Results: The reduction in transmission rates in HIV infants was 33%. In serodiscordant couples the reduction in risk of HIV transmission from Option A to Option B and B+ was 72% and 87%, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained by averting infant infection, and for both infant and partner was US$ 238 and US$ 181 for Option B and US$ 1265 and US$ 947 for Option B+, respectively. Conclusion: It was found that Options B and B+ are more cost-effective as compared to option A. This effectiveness further increases when prevention of partner infections in Option B and B+ is taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.