Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799810›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

Magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features stability in brain metastases: Impact of image preprocessing, image-, and feature-level harmonization.

Zahra Khodabakhshi, Hubert Gabrys, Philipp Wallimann, Matthias Guckenberger, Nicolaus Andratschke, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zahra KhodabakhshiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hubert GabrysDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp WallimannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stephanie Tanadini-LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are highly sensitive to acquisition and reconstruction parameters which affect feature stability and model generalizability in radiomic research. This work aims to investigate the effect of image pre-processing and harmonization methods on the stability of brain MRI radiomic features and the prediction performance of radiomic models in patients with brain metastases (BMs). Materials and methods: Two T1 contrast enhanced brain MRI data-sets were used in this study. The first contained 25 BMs patients with scans at two different time points and was used for features stability analysis. The effect of gray level discretization (GLD), intensity normalization (Z-score, Nyul, WhiteStripe, and in house-developed method named N-Peaks), and ComBat harmonization on features stability was investigated and features with intraclass correlation coefficient >0.8 were considered as stable. The second data-set containing 64 BMs patients was used for a classification task to investigate the informativeness of stable features and the effects of harmonization methods on radiomic model performance. Results: Applying fixed bin number (FBN) GLD, resulted in higher number of stable features compare to fixed bin size (FBS) discretization (10 ± 5.5 % higher). `Harmonization in feature domain improved the stability for non-normalized and normalized images with Z-score and WhiteStripe methods. For the classification task, keeping the stable features resulted in good performance only for normalized images with N-Peaks along with FBS discretization. Conclusions: To develop a robust MRI based radiomic model we recommend using an intensity normalization method based on a reference tissue (e.g N-Peaks) and then using FBS discretization.

Indexed as

Brain metastasesHarmonizationIntensity normalizationMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID38799810
PMCPMC11127267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.