Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799809›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2024

Distinguishing motion artifacts during optical fiber-based

Anupam Bisht, Kathryn Simone, Jaideep S Bains, Kartikeya Murari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anupam BishtUniversity of Calgary, Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8944-5414
Kathryn SimoneUniversity of Calgary, Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jaideep S BainsUniversity of Calgary, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kartikeya MurariUniversity of Calgary, Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5626-2008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Motion artifacts in the signals recorded during optical fiber-based measurements can lead to misinterpretation of data. In this work, we address this problem during Aim: (i) To distinguish the effect of motion artifacts in the SFS signals. (ii) Develop a MAC algorithm by combining information from the experiments and simulations and validate it. Approach: Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations were performed across 450 to 790 nm to identify wavelengths where the reflectance is least sensitive to blood absorption-based changes. This wavelength region is then used to develop a quantitative metric to measure motion artifacts, termed the dissimilarity metric (DM). We used MC simulations to mimic artifacts seen during experiments. Further, we developed a mathematical model describing light intensity at various optical interfaces. Finally, an MAC algorithm was formulated and validated using simulation and experimental data. Results: We found that the 670 to 680 nm wavelength region is relatively less sensitive to blood absorption. The standard deviation of DM ( Conclusions: We distinguished motion artifacts from SFS signals during in vivo hemodynamic monitoring experiments. From simulation and experimental data, we showed that motion artifacts can be modeled as transmission changes. The developed MAC algorithm was shown to minimize artifactual variations in both simulation and experimental data.

Indexed as

hemodynamicsintrinsic optical imagingin-vivo fiber photometryMonte Carlo simulationmotion artifactsoxygen saturation

Identifiers

PMID38799809
PMCPMC11123205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.