ArticleHeliyon2024
Refractory ventricular fibrillation secondary to hyperkalemia resuscitated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case report.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The routine use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is not recommended for patients with cardiac arrest. However, ECPR is considered for selected patients with cardiac arrest of reversible cause. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides temporary cardiopulmonary support and adequate perfusion to the end organs, thereby shortening ischemic organ time and minimizing complications. One indication for ECPR therapy is prolonged ventricular fibrillation despite optimal conventional CPR. Here, we report a successful recovery case from ECPR, in which the patient suffered from refractory ventricular fibrillation and was predisposed to severe hyperkalemia. Ventricular fibrillation failed to respond despite prolonged conventional CPR and defibrillation management for 32 min. After successfully initiating ECPR 54 min after cardiac arrest, spontaneous circulation returned sooner. He demonstrated clear consciousness after treatment and was discharged without any neurological disability on day 11.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.