ArticleHeliyon2024
Development and external validation of a perioperative clinical model for predicting myocardial injury after major abdominal surgery: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic prediction of incidental prostate cancer in radical cystoprostatectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for myocardial injury in individuals undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort analysis included 3546 patients aged ≥45 years who underwent major abdominal surgeries at two Chinese tertiary hospitals. The primary outcome was myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS), defined as prognostically relevant myocardial injury due to ischemia that occurs during or within 30 days after noncardiac surgery. The LASSO algorithm and logistic regression were used to construct a predictive model for postoperative MINS in the development cohort, and the performance of this prediction model was validated in an external independent cohort. Results: A total of 3546 patients were included in our study. MINS manifested in 338 (9.53 %) patients after surgery. The definitive predictive model for MINS was developed by incorporating age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, preoperative hemoglobin concentration, preoperative serum ALB concentration, blood loss, total infusion volume, and operation time. The area under the curve (AUC) of our model was 0.838 and 0.821 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: Preoperative hemoglobin levels, preoperative serum ALB concentrations, infusion volume, and blood loss are independent predictors of MINS. Our predictive model can prove valuable in identifying patients at moderate-to-high risk prior to non-cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.