Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799614›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2024

Intermittent preventive treatment for forest goers by forest malaria workers: an observational study on a key intervention for malaria elimination in Cambodia.

Sophea Iv, Chea Nguon, Phanith Kong, Téphanie Sieng, Sreynet Srun, Céline Christiansen-Jucht, Chanvong Kul, Thornleaksmey Lorn, Sophy Chy, Jean Popovici and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sophea IvEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chea NguonNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Phanith KongEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Téphanie SiengEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sreynet SrunMalaria Research Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Céline Christiansen-JuchtMekong Malaria Elimination Program, World Health Organization, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chanvong KulMalaria Research Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Thornleaksmey LornMalaria Research Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sophy ChyMalaria Research Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Jean PopoviciMalaria Research Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Amélie VantauxMalaria Research Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Benoit WitkowskiMalaria Research Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Antoine BerryUMR 1043 - INFINITY - Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires, Toulouse, France.
Patrice PiolaEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Claude FlamandEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cambodia targets Methods: From March 11, 2019, to January 30, 2021, a malaria intervention program took place in isolated forests in Northeast Cambodia. The first phase focused on observing forest goers (FGs) within the forests, documenting their malaria risk. In the second phase, a monthly artesunate-mefloquine IPTf was implemented by trained forest malaria workers who were former FGs conducting interviews, blood collection, and IPTf administration. Findings: Throughout the two-year period, 2198 FGs were involved in 3579 interviews, with 284 in both the observation and intervention phases. Following IPTf implementation, PCR-confirmed malaria prevalence significantly decreased from 2.9% to 0.5% for Interpretation: The successful implementation of IPTf in Cambodia's remote forests has markedly decreased malaria prevalence among high-risk groups. Cambodia's National Malaria Program has acknowledged this strategy as essential for malaria elimination intervention, endorsing forest-specific approaches to meet the 2025 goal of eradicating all human malaria species in Cambodia. Funding: The study received funding from the French 5% Initiative (Initiative Canal 2-17SANIN205).

Indexed as

CambodiaEliminationForest goerForest malaria workerForestsGreater mekong subregionIntermittent preventive treatmentMalaria

Identifiers

PMID38799614
PMCPMC11127514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.