ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024
Modeling human observer detection for varying data acquisition in undersampled MRI for two-alternative forced choice (2-AFC) and forced localization tasks.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling human observer performance with neural network observers in a forced localization task using undersampled MRI images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Task-based assessment for neural networks: evaluating undersampled MRI reconstructions based on human observer signal detection.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Undersampling in the frequency domain (k-space) in MRI enables faster data acquisition. In this study, we used a fixed 1D undersampling factor of 5x with only 20% of the k-space collected. The fraction of fully acquired low k-space frequencies were varied from 0% (all aliasing) to 20% (all blurring). The images were reconstructed using a multi-coil SENSE algorithm. We used two-alternative forced choice (2-AFC) and the forced localization tasks with a subtle signal to estimate the human observer performance. The 2-AFC average human observer performance remained fairly constant across all imaging conditions. The forced localization task performance improved from the 0% condition to the 2.5% condition and remained fairly constant for the remaining conditions, suggesting that there was a decrease in task performance only in the pure aliasing situation. We modeled the average human performance using a sparse-difference of Gaussians (SDOG) Hotelling observer model. Because the blurring in the undersampling direction makes the mean signal asymmetric, we explored an adaptation for irregular signals that made the SDOG template asymmetric. To improve the observer performance, we also varied the number of SDOG channels from 3 to 4. We found that despite the asymmetry in the mean signal, both the symmetric and asymmetric models reasonably predicted the human performance in the 2-AFC experiments. However, the symmetric model performed slightly better. We also found that a symmetric SDOG model with 4 channels implemented using a spatial domain convolution and constrained to the possible signal locations reasonably modeled the forced localization human observer results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.