Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799438›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2024

Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine to prevent and treat COVID-19 household close contacts in Hong Kong: an open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Peipei Du, Wai Ching Lam, Choryin Leung, Huijuan Li, Zipan Lyu, Chun Sum Yuen, Chun Hoi Cheung, Tsz Fung Lam, Zhaoxiang Bian, Linda Zhong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05269511 (Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Medicine to Prevent and Treat COVID-19 Close Contacts), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05269511 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Medicine to Prevent and Treat COVID-19 Close Contacts: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHong Kong Baptist UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled2,163ConditionsHealthy ParticipantsArmsChinese herbal medicine is in the form of granules (9 g/sachet), which is comprised of ten medicinal herbs.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peipei DuSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wai Ching LamSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Choryin LeungSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Huijuan LiSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Zipan LyuSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chun Sum YuenSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chun Hoi CheungSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Tsz Fung LamSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Zhaoxiang BianSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Linda ZhongSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CHM in the prevention of COVID-19 infection and treatment for COVID-19 related symptoms. Design: Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial. Setting: Participants' home in Hong Kong. Participants: Participants who had household close contact with COVID-19-infected family members. Interventions: Close contacts were stratified into 4 groups (cohort A, B, C, D) based on symptoms and infection status and were randomized in 4:1 ratio to receive CHM granules (9g/sachet, two times daily) or blank control for 7 days with 2 weeks of follow-up. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the rate of positive nucleic acid tests. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of developed COVID-19 related symptoms and adverse events during the whole 3-week study period. Subgroup analysis was used to evaluate demographic factors associated with positive infection rates. Results: A total of 2163 contacts were enrolled and randomly assigned to the CHM group (1720 contacts) and blank control (443 contacts) group. During the 21 days, the rate of PCR-positive cases in cohort A was markedly lower in the CHM group (3.6%) compared to the control group (7.0%) ( Conclusion: The preliminary findings indicate that CHM may be effective and safe in preventing COVID-19. Future double-blind, randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up are needed to fully evaluate the efficacy of CHM in a larger contact population. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05269511.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drugs, Chinese HerbalSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDrugs, Chinese HerbalChinese herbal medicineCOVID-19preventionrandomized controlled trialtreatment

Identifiers

PMID38799438
PMCPMC11116634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.