Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799379›Full record

ArticleJournal of kidney cancer and VHL2024

Preoperative Super-Selective Embolization versus "On-Clamp" Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Tumors- A Prospective Randomized Study.

Vivek Kumar Singh, Debanga Sarma, Sushant Agarwal, Puskal Kumar Bagchi, Mandeep Phukan, Nabajeet Das, Sasanka Kumar Barua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of kidney cancer and VHL, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vivek Kumar SinghDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Debanga SarmaDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Sushant AgarwalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Puskal Kumar BagchiDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Mandeep PhukanDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Nabajeet DasDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Sasanka Kumar BaruaDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze and compare the intraoperative and post-operative outcomes of "on-clamp" laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with "preoperative super-selective angioembolization" before LPN. This randomized clinical study was conducted at Gauhati Medical College Hospital, Guwahati, India, between November 2021 and November 2023. Adult patients of either gender diagnosed with T1 renal tumors were included in the study. All patients underwent diethylenetriamine pentaacetate scan preoperatively and at 1-month follow-up. The patients were randomized using a parallel group design with an allocation ratio of 1:1 to receive either preoperative angioembolization followed by LPN or conventional "on-clamp" LPN. Demographic and baseline parameters were recorded along with pre- and post-operative data. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age (P = 0.11), gender distribution (P = 0.32), body mass index (P = 0.43), preoperative hemoglobin (P = 0.34), and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; P = 0.64). One patient in the embolization group required radical nephrectomy because of accidental backflow of glue into the renal artery during embolization whereas four patients required clamping due to inadequate embolization. Preoperative super-selective embolization yielded significantly less blood loss, compared to "on-clamp" LPN (145 [50.76 mL] vs. 261 [66.12 mL], P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between post-operative eGFR (at 1 month) between the two groups (P = 0.71). Preoperative embolization offers improved outcomes in the dissection plane, total operative time, and blood loss, compared to conventional "on-clamp" LPN but has no significant effect on change in eGFR.

Indexed as

laparoscopic partial nephrectomypreoperative embolizationradical nephrectomyrenal cell carcinomawarm ischemia time

Identifiers

PMID38799379
PMCPMC11126868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.