ArticleACS omega2024
Comparing an Integrated Amphiphilic Surfactant to Traditional Hydrophilic Coatings for the Reduction of Catheter-Associated Urethral Microtrauma.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The efficacy of super-lubricous Foley catheters in indwelling catheterization: a randomized controlled trial.BMC urology · 2026Trial
- Advancing urethral health research: Characterization of a male porcine urethra for lower urinary tract investigations.Histology and histopathology · 2026Article
- Article
- Intermittent Catheters with Integrated Amphiphilic Surfactant Reduce Urethral Microtrauma in anJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters have improved the experience of intermittent urinary catheterization for patients compared to conventional gel-lubricated uncoated catheters. However, the incorporation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) within hydrophilic coatings can lead to significant issues with coating dry-out. Consequently, increased force on catheter withdrawal may cause complications, including urethral microtrauma and pain. Standard methods of evaluating catheter lubricity lack physiological relevance and an understanding of the surface interaction with the urethra. The tribological performance and urethral interaction of commercially available hydrophilic PVP-coated catheters and a coating-free integrated amphiphilic surfactant (IAS) catheter were evaluated by using a biomimetic urethral model designed from a modified coefficient of friction (CoF) assay. T24 human urothelial cells were cultured on customized silicone sheets as an alternate countersurface for CoF testing. Hydrophilic PVP-coated and coating-free IAS catheters were hydrated and the CoF obtained immediately following hydration, or after 2 min, mimicking in vivo indwell time for urine drainage. The model was observed for urethral epithelial cell damage postcatheterization. The majority of hydrophilic PVP-coated catheters caused significantly greater removal of cells from the monolayer after 2 min indwell time, compared to the IAS catheter. Hydrophilic PVP-coated catheters were shown to cause more cell damage than the coating-free IAS catheter. A biomimetic urethral model provides a more physiologically relevant model for understanding the factors that govern the frictional interface between a catheter surface and urethral tissue. From these findings, the use of coating-free IAS catheters instead of hydrophilic PVP-coated catheters may help reduce urethral microtrauma experienced during catheter withdrawal from the bladder, which may lead to a lower risk of infection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.