Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799312›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Improving Cleaning Efficiency through the Measurement of Food Fouling Adhesive Strength.

Didem Sözeri Atik, Ibrahim Palabiyik, Goksel Tirpanci Sivri, Suzan Uzun, Yusuf Koç, Kübra Çalışır

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Didem Sözeri AtikDepartment of Food Engineering, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ 59030, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8547-7304
Ibrahim PalabiyikDepartment of Food Engineering, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ 59030, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8850-1819
Goksel Tirpanci SivriDepartment of Food Engineering, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ 59030, Turkey.
Suzan UzunDepartment of Food Engineering, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ 59030, Turkey.
Yusuf KoçARÇELİK A.Ş. R&D Center, İstanbul 34445, Turkey.
Kübra ÇalışırARÇELİK A.Ş. R&D Center, İstanbul 34445, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impacts of factors, including textural properties, surface roughness, and contact angle, on the cleaning performance of food soils and develop a preliminary mathematical model to predict the cleaning score, depending on the soil-surface properties. The force required to remove soil from the surface was determined by a texture analyzer equipped with a newly designed probe. Potato puree and egg yolk soils showed high adhesive forces compared to other deposits. Margarine required the lowest force to detach from the surfaces. A soil-surface characteristic number (SSCN) was constructed from the results of contact angle, roughness, and textural analysis to predict the cleaning score depending on the soil-surface properties. The experimental work presented indicates that a higher SSCN was associated with lower cleaning scores for soil-surface combinations. Furthermore, a predictive model was developed to define the relationship between cleaning scores and SSCN. The applicability of the model was validated by measuring the cleaning performance of caramel and pudding soils on glass, porcelain, and stainless-steel household surfaces by using an automatic method. Therefore, it can be concluded that the SSCN approach can be improved in further studies to predict cleaning scores of soil-surface combinations in the experimental rig or automatic dishwasher.

Identifiers

PMID38799312
PMCPMC11112590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.