Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799277›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2024

Risk Factors for Acute Postsurgical Pain: A Narrative Review.

Qing-Ren Liu, Yu-Chen Dai, Mu-Huo Ji, Pan-Miao Liu, Yong-Yan Dong, Jian-Jun Yang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07556536 (Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Open Nephrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07556536 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Open Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled132ConditionsPost Operative Pain, Open NephrectomyArmsSerratus Intercostal Plane Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qing-Ren LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xishan People's Hospital of Wuxi City, Wuxi, 214105, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0753-8810
Yu-Chen DaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China.
Mu-Huo JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, People's Republic of China.
Pan-Miao LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China.
Yong-Yan DongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Jun YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6785-9627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute postsurgical pain (APSP) has received growing attention as a surgical outcome. When poorly controlled, APSP can affect short- and long-term outcomes in patients. Despite the steady increase in awareness about postoperative pain and standardization of pain prevention and treatment strategies, moderate-to-severe APSP is frequently reported in clinical practice. This is possibly because pain varies widely among individuals and is influenced by distinct factors, such as demographic, perioperative, psychological, and genetic factors. This review investigates the risk factors for APSP, including gender, age, obesity, smoking history, preoperative pain history, pain sensitivity, preoperative anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, expected postoperative pain, surgical fear, and genetic polymorphisms. By identifying patients having an increased risk of moderate-to-severe APSP at an early stage, clinicians can more effectively manage individualized analgesic treatment protocols with a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. This would alleviate the transition from APSP to chronic pain and reduce the severity of APSP-induced chronic physical disability and social psychological distress.

Indexed as

acute postoperative painacute postsurgical painpredictorsrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38799277
PMCPMC11122256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.