Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799239›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2024

Emergency Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Psychiatric Emergencies in Makkah's General Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Raghad M Ali, Abdulkarim A Aljabri, Nahla H Hariri, Ghadi S Bokhari, Shahad A Alturkistani, Nidaa A Albishri, Hamza A Alzahrani, Shuruq A Alghamdi, Renad T Alhazmi, Enas H Alfalogy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raghad M AliCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0002-1936-646X
Abdulkarim A AljabriCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8055-4756
Nahla H HaririCommunity Medicine and Pilgrims Healthcare Department, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0098-0187
Ghadi S BokhariCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0001-4150-1050
Shahad A AlturkistaniCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0004-6238-6129
Nidaa A AlbishriCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0006-4401-2750
Hamza A AlzahraniCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0000-9972-6095
Shuruq A AlghamdiDirectorate of Health Affairs, Eradah Complex for Mental Health, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3023-3679
Renad T AlhazmiCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1327-628X
Enas H AlfalogyCommunity Medicine and Pilgrims Healthcare Department, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7846-2008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of emergency physicians (EPs) related to psychiatric emergencies (PEs) in Makkah's general hospitals. Sample and Methods: This study was an observational cross-sectional study using an online survey distributed to 138 EPs in the emergency departments (EDs) of six public hospitals in Makkah City, Saudi Arabia, between March 15 and May 1, 2023. A convenience sample was used for data collection. The questionnaire was developed after related surveys in the literature were reviewed. Results: 59.9% of the physicians were aged 20-30 years. Most (68.8%) worked in hospitals that had psychiatric facilities. Regarding knowledge, only 30% of the emergency doctors were considered knowledgeable: the majority could identify PEs (79.7%), perform mental status examinations (71.0%), distinguish physical and mental symptoms (66.7%), and communicate with psychiatric patients (58.0%). However, only 52.9% could initiate management plans by prescribing psychiatric medication to patients. In relation to attitude, most physicians disagreed with the idea that healthcare practitioners do not need to advocate for psychiatric patients (67.4%), but many (62.3%) assumed that they do not have the responsibility to manage psychiatric patients, and they felt that conducting psychiatric evaluations in public hospitals is challenging because of the busy environment there. As regards practice, mentally ill patients (60.9%) were managed or referred by practices, and 56.5% of the EPs advised these patients upon discharge. Conclusion: The study showed that EPs have positive attitudes toward psychiatric patients, but their knowledge varied based on age, occupation levels, and years of experience. There were significant knowledge gaps, particularly regarding effective communication with psychiatric patients. Additionally, many EPs manage psychiatric patients without being aware of the psychiatric resources in their hospital. Improving medical school curricula and postgraduate training can enhance care. However, more research in this field is needed.

Indexed as

emergency departmentsmental status examinationpsychiatric patientspublic hospitals

Identifiers

PMID38799239
PMCPMC11128228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.