Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799228›Full record

ArticleNature machine intelligence2024

Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools.

Andres M Bran, Sam Cox, Oliver Schilter, Carlo Baldassari, Andrew D White, Philippe Schwaller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 218 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
218citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

218 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Transforming Molecular Synthesis With Large Language Models.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. AI/ML-based computational models for toxicity prediction.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review

158 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andres M Bran *Laboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence (LIAC), ISIC, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sam Cox *Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY USA.
Oliver SchilterLaboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence (LIAC), ISIC, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0310-0851
Carlo BaldassariAccelerated Discovery, IBM Research - Europe, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Andrew D WhiteDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6647-3965
Philippe SchwallerLaboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence (LIAC), ISIC, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3046-6576

Funding

Learning to learn in structural biology with deep neural networksR35GM137966 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WHITE, ANDREW DAVID · 2020 to 2023
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM137966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in tasks across domains but struggle with chemistry-related problems. These models also lack access to external knowledge sources, limiting their usefulness in scientific applications. We introduce ChemCrow, an LLM chemistry agent designed to accomplish tasks across organic synthesis, drug discovery and materials design. By integrating 18 expert-designed tools and using GPT-4 as the LLM, ChemCrow augments the LLM performance in chemistry, and new capabilities emerge. Our agent autonomously planned and executed the syntheses of an insect repellent and three organocatalysts and guided the discovery of a novel chromophore. Our evaluation, including both LLM and expert assessments, demonstrates ChemCrow's effectiveness in automating a diverse set of chemical tasks. Our work not only aids expert chemists and lowers barriers for non-experts but also fosters scientific advancement by bridging the gap between experimental and computational chemistry.

Indexed as

ChemistryMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38799228
PMCPMC11116106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.