Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799198›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024

Design of Machine Learning Algorithms and Internal Validation of a Kidney Risk Prediction Model for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Ying Wang, Han-Xin Yao, Zhen-Yi Liu, Yi-Ting Wang, Si-Wen Zhang, Yuan-Yuan Song, Qin Zhang, Hai-Di Gao, Jian-Cheng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Predictive efficacy assessment of serum βAmerican journal of translational research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Han-Xin YaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Yi LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Yi-Ting WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Si-Wen ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Yuan-Yuan SongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Qin ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Hai-Di GaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Cheng XuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8796-271X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore specific biochemical indicators and construct a risk prediction model for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: This study included 234 T2D patients, of whom 166 had DKD, at the First Hospital of Jilin University from January 2021 to July 2022. Clinical characteristics, such as age, gender, and typical hematological parameters, were collected and used for modeling. Five machine learning algorithms [Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF)] were used to identify critical clinical and pathological features and to build a risk prediction model for DKD. Additionally, clinical data from 70 patients (n Results: The RF algorithm demonstrated the best performance in predicting progression to DKD, identifying five major indicators: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), glycated albumin (GA), Uric acid, HbA1c, and Zinc (Zn). The prediction model showed sufficient predictive accuracy with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.936-0.984) and 0.9326 (95% CI: 0.8747-0.9885) in the internal validation set and external validation set, respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of the RF model (AUC = 0.960) was significantly higher than each of the five features screened with the highest feature importance in the RF model. Conclusion: The online DKD risk prediction model constructed using the RF algorithm was selected based on its strong performance in the internal validation.

Indexed as

diabetic kidney diseasemachine learning modelrandom forest algorithmtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID38799198
PMCPMC11122345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.