ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
Design of Machine Learning Algorithms and Internal Validation of a Kidney Risk Prediction Model for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an early risk prediction model based on inflammatory and metabolically derived markers for early diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A nomogram prediction model incorporating noninvasive lens AGEs and conventional biochemical indicators for assessing and predicting diabetic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an explainable neural network model for predicting progression in type 2 diabetic kidney disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Early Diabetic Kidney Disease Risk Profiling in Type 2 Diabetes: Translational Readiness and Clinical Boundaries.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Review
- Integrated multi-omics analysis unveils microbiota-metabolite-host interactions and novel biomarkers for early diabetic kidney disease diagnosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Predictive efficacy assessment of serum βAmerican journal of translational research · 2025Article
- The clinical prediction model to distinguish between colonization and infection byFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Models in Diagnosis and Treatment of Kidney Diseases: Current Status and Prospects.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore specific biochemical indicators and construct a risk prediction model for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: This study included 234 T2D patients, of whom 166 had DKD, at the First Hospital of Jilin University from January 2021 to July 2022. Clinical characteristics, such as age, gender, and typical hematological parameters, were collected and used for modeling. Five machine learning algorithms [Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF)] were used to identify critical clinical and pathological features and to build a risk prediction model for DKD. Additionally, clinical data from 70 patients (n Results: The RF algorithm demonstrated the best performance in predicting progression to DKD, identifying five major indicators: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), glycated albumin (GA), Uric acid, HbA1c, and Zinc (Zn). The prediction model showed sufficient predictive accuracy with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.936-0.984) and 0.9326 (95% CI: 0.8747-0.9885) in the internal validation set and external validation set, respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of the RF model (AUC = 0.960) was significantly higher than each of the five features screened with the highest feature importance in the RF model. Conclusion: The online DKD risk prediction model constructed using the RF algorithm was selected based on its strong performance in the internal validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.