Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799108›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Safety and Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with 15 or more Brain Metastases.

Rituraj Upadhyay, Joshua D Palmer, Brett G Klamer, Haley K Perlow, Jonathan E Schoenhals, Jayeeta Ghose, Prajwal Rajappa, Dukagjin M Blakaj, Sasha Beyer, John C Grecula and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Osimertinib-chemotherapy synergy inTranslational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Rituraj UpadhyayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Joshua D PalmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Brett G KlamerCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Haley K PerlowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Jonathan E SchoenhalsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Jayeeta GhoseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Prajwal RajappaDepartment of Pediatrics and Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH and Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Dukagjin M BlakajDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Sasha BeyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
John C GreculaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Austin J SimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Lanchun LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Wesley ZollerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
James B ElderDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Arnab ChakravartiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Evan ThomasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Raju R RavalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current standard of care treatment for patients with ≥15 brain metastases (BM) is whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), despite poor neurocognitive outcomes. We analyzed our institutional experience of treating these patients with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), with the aim of evaluating safety, cognitive outcomes, and survival metrics. Methods: Patients who received SRS for ≥15 BMs in 1 to 5 fractions from 2014 to 2022 were included. Cognitive outcomes were objectively evaluated using serial Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and log-rank test for intergroup comparisons. Results: Overall, 118 patients underwent 124 courses of LINAC-based SRS. The median number of lesions treated per course was 20 (range, 15-94). Most patients received fractionated SRS to a dose of 24 Gy in 3 fractions (81.5%). At the time of SRS, 19.4% patients had received prior WBRT, and 24.2% had received prior SRS. The rate of any grade radiation necrosis (RN) and grade ≥3 RN were 15.3% and 3.2%, respectively. When evaluating longitudinal PROMIS score trends, 25 of 31 patients had a stable/improved PROMIS score. Patients who did not receive prior brain RT had a longer median survival (7.4 months vs 4.6 months, Conclusion: We present here one of the largest studies evaluating SRS for patients with ≥15 BMs. SRS was safe, had favorable cognitive outcomes, and had comparable survival outcomes to contemporary studies evaluating WBRT in this population. Treatment-naïve patients had a median survival of >6 months, long enough to benefit from cognitive sparing with SRS. Our study supports randomized studies comparing SRS and hippocampal avoidance WBRT approaches for these patients.

Identifiers

PMID38799108
PMCPMC11127210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.