Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799104›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Response Associates with Metastasis-Free Survival After Stereotactic Ablative Radiation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.

Philip Sutera, Matthew P Deek, Rebecca A Deek, Ozan Cem Guler, Pervin Hurmuz, Mehmet Reyhan, Steven Rowe, Noura Radwan, Shirl Dipasquale, William T Hrinivich and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Philip SuteraDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Matthew P DeekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Rebecca A DeekDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ozan Cem GulerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Adana, Turkey.
Pervin HurmuzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet ReyhanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Adana, Turkey.
Steven RoweThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Noura RadwanDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Shirl DipasqualeDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
William T HrinivichDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kathryn LoweDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lei RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Biren SaraiyaDivision of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Ronald EnnisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Lara HathoutDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Tina MayerDivision of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Theodore L DeweeseDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel Y SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ana KiessDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ezgi OymakDivision of Radiation Oncology, Iskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.
Kenneth PientaDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Felix FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Martin PomperDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gokhan OzyigitDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Phuoc T TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Cem OnalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Adana, Turkey.
Ryan M PhillipsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

Resource Sharing CoreU54CA273956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Amit Sawant, Nicole L Simone · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA273956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Emerging data suggest that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) improves outcomes in patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) can detect occult metastatic disease, and PSMA response has been proposed as a biomarker for treatment response. Herein, we identify and validate a PSMA-PET biomarker for metastasis-free survival (MFS) following MDT in omCSPC. Methods and Materials: We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with omCSPC, defined as ≤3 lesions, treated with metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiation who underwent PSMA-PET/computed tomography (CT) before and after (median, 6.2 months; range, 2.4-10.9 months) treatment. Pre- and post-MDT PSMA-PET/CT maximum standardized uptake value (SUV Results: A total of 131 patients with 261 treated metastases were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR, 18.5-41.3 months). After stereotactic ablative radiation, 70.2% of patients were classified as PSMA responders. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that PSMA response as a continuous variable was associated with a significantly worse MFS (hazard ratio = 1.003; 95% CI, 1.001-1.006; Conclusions: After stereotactic ablative radiation, PSMA-PET response appears to be a radiographic biomarker that correlates with MFS in omCSPC. This approach holds promise for guiding clinical management of omCSPC and should be validated in a prospective setting.

Identifiers

PMID38799104
PMCPMC11127093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.