Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38799097›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Harnessing monocrop breeding strategies for intercrops.

Reena Dubey, Riccardo Zustovi, Sofie Landschoot, Kevin Dewitte, Greet Verlinden, Geert Haesaert, Steven Maenhout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reena DubeyDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Riccardo ZustoviDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sofie LandschootDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Kevin DewitteDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Greet VerlindenDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Geert HaesaertDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Steven MaenhoutDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intercropping is considered advantageous for many reasons, including increased yield stability, nutritional value and the provision of various regulating ecosystem services. However, intercropping also introduces diverse competition effects between the mixing partners, which can negatively impact their agronomic performance. Therefore, selecting complementary intercropping partners is the key to realizing a well-mixed crop production. Several specialized intercrop breeding concepts have been proposed to support the development of complementary varieties, but their practical implementation still needs to be improved. To lower this adoption threshold, we explore the potential of introducing minor adaptations to commonly used monocrop breeding strategies as an initial stepping stone towards implementing dedicated intercrop breeding schemes. While we acknowledge that recurrent selection for reciprocal mixing abilities is likely a more effective breeding paradigm to obtain genetic progress for intercrops, a well-considered adaptation of monoculture breeding strategies is far less intrusive concerning the design of the breeding programme and allows for balancing genetic gain for both monocrop and intercrop performance. The main idea is to develop compatible variety combinations by improving the monocrop performance in the two breeding pools in parallel and testing for intercrop performance in the later stages of selection. We show that the optimal stage for switching from monocrop to intercrop testing should be adapted to the specificity of the crop and the heritability of the traits involved. However, the genetic correlation between the monocrop and intercrop trait performance is the primary driver of the intercrop breeding scheme optimization process.

Indexed as

compatibility traitsgenetic gainheritabilityintercropmonocropplant breeding

Identifiers

PMID38799097
PMCPMC11119317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.