ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
Diagnostic accuracy of lever sign test in acute and chronic ACL injuries.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a commonly affected knee ligament prone to frequent injuries. Henceforth, we aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of lever sign test in Acute and chronic ACL injuries. Method: At the institution's initial outpatient visit, 150 consecutive patients (92 males and 58 females) were evaluated. Total 108 patients had injury in their right leg, whereas 42 had injury in their left leg. Based on time since injury, the patients were divided into Acute and chronic groups. Clinical examinations (lachman's test and lelli's test) of all patients were confirmed with arthroscopic findings and compared between the two groups. Results: In the acute ACL injury, the lever test had a kappa value 0.704. The accuracy and sensitivity of the Lachman, anterior drawer, pivot shift, and lever tests were calculated. We found that the lever test had the highest accuracy and sensitivity (85.48 %, 91.18 %) than the rest. In the chronic ACL injury, the kappa value for the results of the Lachman test evaluation was 0.723. The chronic ACL injuries accuracy and sensitivity values for the Lachman (86.36 %, 91.67 %), anterior drawer (76.14 %, 81.25 %), pivot shift (55.68 %, 58.49 %), and lever tests were determined. Conclusion: The lever sign test is more accurate and reliable in the acute ACL injuries, while the Lachman test is more accurate and reliable in the chronic ACL injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.