ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Histologic Examination of Mastectomy Scars during Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinically Silent Local Recurrence of Breast Cancer Detected in a Mastectomy Scar During DIEP Flap Reconstruction: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast reconstruction is a standard procedure in postmastectomy plastic surgery. The necessity of routine histological examinations for mastectomy scars during delayed reconstruction remains a topic of debate. We evaluated the need for histological examination of scars during delayed breast reconstruction. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, TDnet, and Cochrane Central in August 2023. Inclusion criteria involved delayed breast reconstruction with histological scar analysis and malignancy reporting. Exclusion criteria encompassed noncancerous breast diseases, prophylactic mastectomies, articles lacking relevant information, case reports, technique descriptions, and reviews. We independently assessed articles. Differences in recurrence rates were determined using a Z-test for proportions. A linear regression model explored the relationship between reconstruction timing and pathological results. The number needed to treat was calculated based on the literature. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare mean reconstruction times and postreconstruction follow-up between groups. Results: Our analysis covered 11 retrospective observational studies published between 2003 and 2018, including 3754 mastectomy scars. The malignancy recurrence rate was 0.19%, consistent with previous reports, with a number needed to treat of 144.93-188.68 patients. The timing of breast reconstruction postmastectomy averaged 19.9 months, without statistically significant association between reconstruction timing and recurrence rates. Postreconstruction follow-up periods ranged from 60 to 87 months. The postreconstruction adverse outcomes ratio was 2.21%. Conclusions: Assessing the necessity of histological examination in breast reconstruction is complex. Based on the literature and this study, we do not recommend routine histological examination of mastectomy scars during delayed reconstruction. A selective approach based on risk factors may be beneficial, warranting further research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.