Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38798900›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

High Rates of Missed HIV Testing Among Oral PrEP Users in the United States From 2018-2021: A National Assessment on Compliance With HIV Testing Recommendations of the CDC PrEP Guidelines.

Jason Baron, Tamar Tchelidze, Benjamin LaBrot, Joseph Yao, Kenneth H Mayer, Daniel Kuritzkes, Nicole Robinson, Rupa R Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Estimating the Economic Consequences of Leveraging the Novel cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 Qualitative Nucleic Acid Amplification Test in Routine HIV Testing.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jason BaronRoche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-6349
Tamar TchelidzeRoche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Benjamin LaBrotRoche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, California, USA.
Joseph YaoMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kenneth H MayerFenway Health and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel KuritzkesBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nicole RobinsonRoche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Rupa R PatelWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends HIV testing every 3 months in oral PrEP users. We performed a national assessment of HIV testing compliance among oral PrEP users. Methods: We analyzed 408 910 PrEP prescriptions issued to 39 809 PrEP users using a national insurance claims database that contained commercial and Medicaid claims. We identified PrEP use based on pharmacy claims and outpatient diagnostic coding. We evaluated the percentage of PrEP prescription refills without HIV testing (identified by CPT codes) within the prior 3, 6, and 12 months using time to event methods. We performed subgroup and multivariate analyses by age, gender, race, insurance type, and geography. Results: Of 39 809 persons, 36 197 were commercially insured, 3612 were Medicaid-insured, and 96% identified as male; the median age (interquartile range) was 34 (29-44) years, and the Medicaid-insured PrEP users were 24% Black/African American, 44% White, and 9% Hispanic/Latinx. Within the prior 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, the percentage of PrEP prescription fills in individuals without HIV Ag/Ab testing was 34.3% (95% CI, 34.2%-34.5%), 23.8% (95% CI, 23.7%-23.9%), and 16.6% (95% CI, 16.4%-16.7%), and the percentage without any type of HIV test was 25.8% (95% CI, 25.6%-25.9%), 14.6% (95% CI, 14.5%-14.7%), and 7.8% (95% CI, 7.7%-7.9%). Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 3 oral PrEP prescriptions were filled in persons who had not received an HIV Ag/Ab test within the prior 3 months, with evidence of health disparities. These findings inform clinical PrEP monitoring efforts and compliance with national HIV testing guidance to monitor PrEP users.

Indexed as

HIV testinglaboratory utilizationpre-exposure prophylaxisPrEPquality of care

Identifiers

PMID38798900
PMCPMC11127479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.