ArticleDigital health
Economic evidence of clinical decision support systems in mental health: A systematic literature review.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceptions of resident doctors on how digital clinical decision support influences decisions on use of resources.The Ulster medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health conditions are among the highest disease burden on society, affecting approximately 20% of children and adolescents at any point in time, with depression and anxiety being the leading causes of disability globally. To improve treatment outcomes, healthcare organizations turned to clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) that offer patient-specific diagnoses and recommendations. However, the economic impact of CDSS is limited, especially in child and adolescent mental health. This systematic literature review examined the economic impacts of CDSS implemented in mental health services. We planned to follow PRISMA reporting guidelines and found only one paper to describe health and economic outcomes. A randomized, controlled trial of 336 participants found that 60% of the intervention group and 32% of the control group achieved symptom reduction, i.e. a 50% decrease as per the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), a method to evaluate psychological problems and identify symptoms. Analysis of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio found that for every 1% of patients with a successful treatment result, it added €57 per year. There are not enough studies to draw conclusions about the cost-effectiveness in a mental health context. More studies on economic evaluations of the viability of CDSS within mental healthcare have the potential to contribute to patients and the larger society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.