ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome carries an increased lifetime risk for obstetric and thrombotic complications-a population-based study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Long Term Follow-up of Patients With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Antiphospholipid Antibodies From the APS 1994 Study.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026Article
- The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in antiphospholipid syndrome.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Coagulation parameter-based nomogram for the diagnosis of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome and its subtypes.Open life sciences · 2026Article
- Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a platelet factor 4 (PF4)-centric immunothrombotic disorder.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- B Cell Tolerance and Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Identification of Three Distinct Subgroups in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Implication for Sex Differences and Prognostic Outcomes from a Multicenter Study.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a comprehensive literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Review
- Text phrase-mining in identifying and classifying maternal proteins and genes across preeclampsia and similar pathologies.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) can present with either a thromboembolic event (thrombotic APS, TAPS) or an obstetric complication (obstetric APS, OAPS). Data on long-term complications in the different APS phenotypes are limited. Objectives: We aimed to compare obstetric history, antiphospholipid antibody profiles, obstetric and thromboembolic complications, and pregnancy outcomes between TAPS and OAPS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women who delivered singleton pregnancies between 1998 and 2020. One hundred sixteen thousand four hundred nine women were included, resulting in 320,455 deliveries. Among the included patients, 71 were diagnosed with APS, 49 were classified as OAPS, and 22 as TAPS. The demographics, obstetric, neonatal, and thrombotic outcomes were compared among TAPS, OAPS, and the general obstetric population. Results: OAPS patients had an increased risk of thrombotic events compared with the general obstetric population (odds ratio [OR] 18.0; 95% CI, 8.7-37.2). In pregnancies following the diagnosis of APS, despite standard antithrombotic treatment, OAPS patients exhibited an elevated risk of placenta-related and neonatal complications compared with the general obstetric population (late fetal loss [adjusted OR {aOR}, 15.3; 95% CI, 0.5-27.5], stillbirth [aOR, 5.9; 95% CI, 2.2-15.4], placental abruption [aOR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.5-15.3], preeclampsia [aOR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.5-7.7], fetal growth restriction [aOR, 4.3; 95% CI, 8.5-27.5], small for gestational age neonate [aOR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.4-6.6], and low Apgar scores [Apgar'1: aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-10.4; Apgar'5: aOR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3-10.4]). TAPS patients exhibited increased risk of preeclampsia (aOR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.2-8). Conclusion: OAPS patients exhibit a heightened risk of thrombotic events compared with the general obstetric population. Despite treatment, OAPS and TAPS still presented obstetric complications. These findings, after confirmation in prospective studies, need to be taken into consideration when planning the treatment approach for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.