ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024
Pelvic lymph node motion during cone-beam computed tomography guided stereotactic radiotherapy.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Setup and target volume shape variation in rectal cancer radiotherapy: a systematic literature review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Review
- A Comparative, Multiobserver Analysis of Nodal Contouring Methods in Pelvic Online Cone Beam-Based Adaptive Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for pelvic lymph node recurrence. Thus far, knowledge on pelvic lymph node motion during CBCT-guided SBRT is lacking and the applied margins vary between institutions. This study evaluated pelvic lymph node motion during CBCT-guided SBRT and assessed the currently applied PTV margins of 3 and 5 mm. Material and methods: In total, 45 pelvic lymph node metastases were included. One observer delineated 45 GTVs on planning CT, 224 GTVs on pre-fraction and 216 on post-fraction CBCT. The GTV centroid coordinates were derived from all images for inter- and intrafraction motion analysis. Additionally, we assessed the influence of treatment time and lesion location on lesion motion. The expected coverage of a 3-mm and 5-mm PTV margin was assessed using the inclusiveness index for GTVs on pre- and post-fraction CBCT. Results: Lymph node interfraction motion was limited to 5 mm in 96-97 % of fractions for all translational directions and intrafraction lesion motion was limited to 3 mm in 97-100 % of fractions. Para-rectal lesions (11 %) were associated with significantly larger inter- and intrafraction motion compared to other pelvic locations and treatment duration showed no correlation with lesion motion. The mean (sd) lesion inclusiveness index was 99 % (5 %) for the 5-mm PTV margin and 96 % (9 %) for the 3-mm margin. Conclusion: Pelvic lymph node motion during CBCT-guided stereotactic radiotherapy was within the widely applied PTV margin of 5 mm, providing an opportunity to reduce this margin for pelvic lymph node SBRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.