Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38798745›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2024

PPARA ameliorates sepsis-induced myocardial injury via promoting macrophage M2 polarization by interacting with DUSP1.

Li Cheng, Dezhi Liu, Shanglan Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Li ChengGeneral Intensive Care Unit (GICU), Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang City, 453000, China.
Dezhi LiuRespiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU), Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang City, 453000, China.
Shanglan GaoGeneral Intensive Care Unit (GICU), Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang City, 453000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The morbidity and mortality of sepsis are increasing year by year. Statistically, 40-50% of patients with sepsis have concomitant myocardial injury, and its mortality rate is higher than that of patients with sepsis only. Therefore, it is of great significance to elucidate the mechanism of sepsis-induced myocardial injury. Methods and results: Human monocytes (THP-1) were used to induce M0 macrophages, followed by treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Cardiomyocytes (AC16) were co-cultured with the conditioned medium of LPS-induced macrophages to induce injury. Quantitative real-time PCR was employed to detect the mRNA levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARA) and dual specificity phosphatase 1 (DUSP1). Protein levels of PPARA, macrophage polarization-related markers, apoptosis-related markers, mitochondria-related proteins, and DUSP1 were analyzed by Western blot. Flow cytometry was used to assess M1/M2 cell rates and apoptosis. Low PPARA expression could serve as a biomarker for patients with sepsis. PPARA overexpression enhanced M2 polarization and suppressed M1 polarization in LPS-induced macrophages, and it could alleviate cardiomyocyte injury in co-cultured system. PPARA bound to the DUSP1 promoter region and facilitated its expression. DUSP1 knockdown reversed the effect of PPARA overexpression on M2 polarization and cardiomyocyte injury. Conclusion: PPARA attenuated cardiomyocyte injury by promoting macrophage M2 polarization through increasing DUSP1 expression, suggesting that PPARA might be a therapy target for sepsis-induced myocardial injury.

Indexed as

DUSP1M2 polarizationMyocardial injuryPPARASepsis

Identifiers

PMID38798745
PMCPMC11126881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.