Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38798744›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2024

Opinions on research involving human embryo models by researchers and the general public.

Hideki Yui, Yoshimi Yashiro, Kaori Muto, Saori Watanabe, Yukitaka Kiya, Yusuke Inoue, Zentaro Yamagata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hideki YuiRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshimi YashiroMedical Innovation Center, Fujita Health University, Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaori MutoRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Saori WatanabeThe Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukitaka KiyaThe Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke InoueDepartment of Healthcare Ethics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan.
Zentaro YamagataCenter for Birth Cohort Studies, University of Yamanashi, Chuo-shi, Yamanashi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rules and ethical considerations regarding research on embryo models have been debated across numerous countries. In this paper, we provide insights from our attitude survey conducted among Japanese researchers, including members of the Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine, and among the general public residing in Japan, the US, the UK, Canada, and Australia. Our survey revealed that many researchers expressed the need for clear guidelines for embryo model research. Furthermore, a minority but significant portion of the general public in each country expressed opposition to research on embryo models but did not oppose research involving real embryos.

Indexed as

Attitude surveyGeneral publicHuman embryo modelInternational comparisonResearcher

Identifiers

PMID38798744
PMCPMC11126766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.