Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38798719›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Integrated System Responses for Families Impacted by Violence: A Scoping Review.

Claire Gear, Chien Ting, Carey Manuel, Elizabeth Eppel, Jane Koziol-McLain

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claire GearCentre for Interdisciplinary Trauma Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1310-0188
Chien TingCentre for Interdisciplinary Trauma Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1201-3218
Carey ManuelĀio Consulting Limited, Tauranga Moana, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9494-649X
Elizabeth EppelSchool of Government, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5331-2911
Jane Koziol-McLainCentre for Interdisciplinary Trauma Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3453-023x

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Violence within families is a complex problem which significantly impacts health and wellbeing. Despite the ubiquitous call for integrated family violence service delivery, integrated approaches vary significantly and challenges to implementation remain. This scoping review explored how integrated approaches to family violence service delivery are conceptualised within international and Aotearoa New Zealand literature. Methods: Following a documented scoping review process identified from literature, dynamic interplay between system agents within integrated family violence service delivery were mapped with the assistance of a complexity theory lens. We analysed characteristics of included studies, agents involved, how they interacted and the methods and mechanisms of integration among them. Results: Seventy-two published reports were included. The most common interactions occurred between statutory agencies such as police and child protection. While health care service providers were included within 55 studies, their engagement was often peripheral. Qualitative analysis elucidated three broad pathways to service delivery impact underpinned by systems-centred, person-centred, or Indigenous-centred worldviews. Discussion and Conclusion: Integrated approaches to family violence service delivery are highly variable. Despite a strong assumption that integration leads to improved safety, health, and wellbeing for care-seekers, most studies did not include evidence of such impact. Consideration of how worldviews characterise service provision provides insight into why integration has proven challenging over time.

Indexed as

complexity theoryhealth careIndigenousservice deliverysystem integrationviolence

Identifiers

PMID38798719
PMCPMC11122700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.