ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Amino Acid-Dependent Material Properties of Tetrapeptide Condensates.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Condensates formed by intrinsically disordered proteins mediate a myriad of cellular processes and are linked to pathological conditions including neurodegeneration. Rules of how different types of amino acids (e.g., π-π pairs) dictate the physical properties of biomolecular condensates are emerging, but our understanding of the roles of different amino acids is far from complete. Here we studied condensates formed by tetrapeptides of the form XXssXX, where X is an amino acid and ss represents a disulfide bond along the backbone. Eight peptides form four types of condensates at different concentrations and pH values: droplets (X = F, L, M, P, V, A); amorphous dense liquids (X = L, M, P, V, A); amorphous aggregates (X = W), and gels (X = I, V, A). The peptides exhibit enormous differences in phase equilibrium and material properties, including a 368-fold range in the threshold concentration for phase separation and a 3856-fold range in viscosity. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations provide physical explanations of these results. The present work also reveals widespread critical behaviors, including critical slowing down manifested by the formation of amorphous dense liquids and critical scaling obeyed by fusion speed, with broad implications for condensate function.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.