ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Kinetic Analysis of Lanthipeptide Cyclization by Substrate-Tolerant ProcM.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lanthipeptides are ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides characterized by the presence of thioether crosslinks. Class II lanthipeptide synthetases are bifunctional enzymes responsible for the multistep chemical modification of these natural products. ProcM is a class II lanthipeptide synthetase known for its remarkable substrate tolerance and ability to install diverse (methyl)lanthionine rings with high accuracy. Previous studies suggested that the final ring pattern of the lanthipeptide product may be determined by the substrate sequence rather than by ProcM, and that ProcM operates by a kinetically controlled mechanism, wherein the ring pattern is dictated by the relative rates of the individual cyclization reactions. This study utilizes kinetic assays to determine if rates of isolated modifications can predict the final ring pattern present in prochlorosins. Changes in the core substrate sequence resulted in changes to the reaction rates of ring formation as well as a change in the order of modifications. Additionally, individual chemical reaction rates were significantly impacted by the presence of other modifications on the peptide. These findings indicate that the rates of isolated modifications are capable of predicting the final ring pattern but are not necessarily a good predictor of the order of modification in WT ProcA3.3 and its variants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.