Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38798574›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Processing of auditory feedback in perisylvian and insular cortex.

Garret Lynn Kurteff, Alyssa M Field, Saman Asghar, Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara, Dave Clarke, Howard L Weiner, Anne E Anderson, Andrew J Watrous, Robert J Buchanan, Pradeep N Modur and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Garret Lynn KurteffDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5800-546X
Alyssa M FieldDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1795-4233
Saman AsgharDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Elizabeth C Tyler-KabaraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3286-1094
Dave ClarkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9032-1291
Howard L WeinerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Anne E AndersonDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7639-2504
Andrew J WatrousDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert J BuchananDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Pradeep N ModurDepartment of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Liberty S HamiltonDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-2500

Funding

Electrophysiological Approaches to Understanding Functional Organization of Speech in the BrainR01DC018579 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HAMILTON, J LIBERTY S, HENRY, MAYA · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When we speak, we not only make movements with our mouth, lips, and tongue, but we also hear the sound of our own voice. Thus, speech production in the brain involves not only controlling the movements we make, but also auditory and sensory feedback. Auditory responses are typically suppressed during speech production compared to perception, but how this manifests across space and time is unclear. Here we recorded intracranial EEG in seventeen pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with medication-resistant epilepsy who performed a reading/listening task to investigate how other auditory responses are modulated during speech production. We identified onset and sustained responses to speech in bilateral auditory cortex, with a selective suppression of onset responses during speech production. Onset responses provide a temporal landmark during speech perception that is redundant with forward prediction during speech production. Phonological feature tuning in these "onset suppression" electrodes remained stable between perception and production. Notably, the posterior insula responded at sentence onset for both perception and production, suggesting a role in multisensory integration during feedback control.

Indexed as

auditory perceptionintracranial electrophysiologylanguagespeechspeech motor controlspeech production

Identifiers

PMID38798574
PMCPMC11118286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.