ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Computational Phenomapping of Randomized Clinical Trials to Enable Assessment of their Real-world Representativeness and Personalized Inference.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRandomized clinical trials (RCTs) define evidence-based medicine, but quantifying their generalizability to real-world patients remains challenging. We propose a multidimensional approach to compare individuals in RCT and electronic health record (EHR) cohorts by quantifying their representativeness and estimating real-world effects based on individualized treatment effects (ITE) observed in RCTs.
methodsWe identified 65 pre-randomization characteristics of an RCT of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT), and extracted those features from patients with HFpEF from the EHR within the Yale New Haven Health System. We then assessed the real-world generalizability of TOPCAT by developing a multidimensional machine learning-based phenotypic distance metric between TOPCAT stratified by region including the United States (US) and Eastern Europe (EE) and EHR cohorts. Finally, from the ITE identified in TOPCAT participants, we assessed spironolactone benefit within the EHR cohorts.
resultsThere were 3,445 patients in TOPCAT and 8,121 patients with HFpEF across 4 hospitals. Across covariates, the EHR patient populations were more similar to each other than the TOPCAT-US participants (median SMD 0.065, IQR 0.011-0.144 vs median SMD 0.186, IQR 0.040-0.479). At the multi-variate level using the phenotypic distance metric, our multidimensional similarity score found a higher generalizability of the TOPCAT-US participants to the EHR cohorts than the TOPCAT-EE participants. By phenotypic distance, a 47% of TOPCAT-US participants were closer to each other than any individual EHR patient. Using a TOPCAT-US-derived model of ITE from spironolactone, all patients were predicted to derive benefit from spironolactone treatment in the EHR cohort, while a TOPCAT-EE-derived model predicted 13% of patients to derive benefit.
conclusionsThis novel multidimensional approach evaluates the real-world representativeness of RCT participants against corresponding patients in the EHR, enabling the evaluation of an RCT's implication for real-world patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.