Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38798126›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2024

Beta amyloid PET scans for dementia diagnoses: Practice and research implications from CARE-IDEAS.

Terrie T Wetle, Courtney H Van Houtven, Megan E Shepherd-Banigan, Emmanuelle Belanger, Elyse Couch, Corinna Sorenson, Emily A Gadbois, James R Burke, Eric Jutkowitz, Emily C O'Brien and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Terrie T WetleDepartment of Health Services Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-0585
Courtney H Van HoutvenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Megan E Shepherd-BaniganDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Emmanuelle BelangerDepartment of Health Services Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Elyse CouchDepartment of Health Services Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Corinna SorensonDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Emily A GadboisDepartment of Health Services Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-2732
James R BurkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Eric JutkowitzDepartment of Health Services Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-8434
Emily C O'BrienDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Brenda L PlassmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Caregivers' Reactions and Experience: Imaging Dementia Evidence for Amyloid Scanning CARE IDEASR01AG053934 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WETLE, TERRIE FOX · 2017 to 2020
$4.5M
Alzheimer's AssociationAmerican College of Radiology Imaging NetworkNIA NIH HHS R01 AG053934NIA NIH HHS R01AG053934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beta amyloid PET scans are a minimally invasive biomarker that may inform Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. The Caregiver's Reactions and Experience (CARE) study, an IDEAS supplement, aimed to understand experiences of PET scan recipients and their care partners regarding motivations for scans, reporting and interpreting results, and impact of results. Patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia who agreed to join the CARE-IDEAS study and their care partners participated in a baseline survey and follow-up survey approximately 18 months later, supplemented by in-depth qualitative interviews with subsets of participants. Patients who received scans and volunteered for follow-up research were more likely to be male, better educated, and have higher income than the general population. Survey information was merged with Medicare data. This article integrates findings from several CARE-IDEAS publications and provides implications for practice and research. Although most participants accurately reported scan results, they were often confused about their meaning for prognosis. Some participants reported distress with results, but there were no significant changes in measured depression, burden, or economic strain over time. Many respondents desired more information about prognosis and supportive resources. Scan results were not differentially associated with changes in service use over time. Findings suggest a need for carefully designed and tested tools for clinicians to discuss risks and benefits of scans and their results, and resources to support patients and care partners in subsequent planning. Learning of scan results provides a point-of-contact that should be leveraged to facilitate shared decision-making and person-centered longitudinal AD care.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaPositron-Emission TomographyAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersAlzheimer'sbeta amyloid PETcare partnerspatients

Identifiers

PMID38798126
PMCPMC11461134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.