Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38798123›Full record

ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2024

Effect of increasing doses of colchicine on the treatment of 333 COVID-19 inpatients.

Rumen Tiholov, Aleksander I Lilov, Gergana Georgieva, Kiril R Palaveev, Konstantin Tashkov, Vanyo Mitev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. COVID-19 Prophylactic Effect of Bromhexine Hydrochloride.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Colchicine-The Divine Medicine against COVID-19.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rumen TiholovInternal Medicine and Pulmology Department, MHAT "Sv Ivan Rilsky", Kozloduy, Bulgaria.
Aleksander I LilovDepartment of Pneumology and Phthysiatrics, SHATPPD " Sofia district", Sofia, Bulgaria.
Gergana GeorgievaRheumatology Department, MHAT Sv Ivan Rilsky, Kozloduy, Bulgaria.
Kiril R PalaveevDepartment of Pneumology and Phthysiatrics, SHATPPD " Sofia district", Sofia, Bulgaria.
Konstantin TashkovDepartment of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University-Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Vanyo MitevDepartment of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University-Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-7528-590X

Funding

Bulgarian National Science Fund BG-RRP-2.004-0004-C01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research done in Bulgaria demonstrated a fivefold reduction in mortality from COVID-19 with increased doses of colchicine from two hospitals in the country. We report here a further 333 cases of COVID-19 inpatients, treated with different doses of colchicine and its effect on mortality. MATERIALS AND

methodsA case-control comparison from two additional hospitals was conducted between increased doses of colchicine and added bromhexine to standard of care (SOC) versus current SOC. Risk and odds ratio, as well as subgroup analysis, was conducted with newly reported data, alongside aggregate data from all hospital centers to determine the extent of mortality reduction in COVID-19 inpatients.

resultsThere was a clear reduction in the mortality of inpatients with increasing doses of colchicine-between twofold and sevenfold. Colchicine loading doses of 4 mg are more effective than those with 2 mg. Despite these doses being higher than the so-called "standard doses," colchicine inpatients experienced lower mortality than SOC patients (5.7% vs. 19.53%). This mortality benefit was evident in different age subgroups, with a 4-mg loading dose of colchicine proving slightly superior to a 2-mg loading dose. Colchicine led to an overall relative risk reduction of 70.7%, with SOC patients having 3.91 higher odds of death. The safety of the doses was not different than the reported in the summary of product characteristics.

conclusionInpatients in Bulgaria with added colchicine and bromhexine to SOC achieved better clinical and mortality outcomes than those on SOC alone. These results question the World Health Organization-recommended strategy to inhibit viral replication. We posit that our treatment strategy to inhibit the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 entry into the cell with inhaled bromhexine and the hyperactivated NLRP3 inflammasome with higher doses of colchicine, prevents the development of cytokine storm. The timing of the initiation of treatment seems critical.

Indexed as

ColchicineCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBulgariaCase-Control StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeColchicinecolchicineCOVID‐19 mortalityCOVID‐19 treatmentcytokine stormNLRP3 inflammasome

Identifiers

PMID38798123
PMCPMC11128776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.