Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38798006›Full record

ArticleUrology research & practice2024

Can We Predict Renal Function Recovery After Pyeloplasty in Pediatrics with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction? A Systematic Review.

Safendra Siregar, Akhmad Mustafa, Steven Steven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology research & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Safendra SiregarDepartment of Urology, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Akhmad MustafaDepartment of Urology, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Steven StevenDepartment of Urology, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic unilateral renal obstruction, primarily caused by ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), poses challenges in determining the optimal timing for corrective surgery. The goal is to preserve renal function and alleviate symptoms, but there is no definitive diagnostic test to reliably predict the outcomes of surgery. This systematic review aimed to identify predictors for renal function recovery after pyeloplasty in order to guide effective treatment options. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using keywords related to renal function, pyeloplasty, and predictors. The search was conducted on March 10, 2022. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Out of 344 potentially relevant articles, 11 met the eligibility criteria for this study. These included 6 retrospective and 5 prospective studies, with a total of 925 participants. Most studies evaluated renal function using differential renal function (DRF). The overall quality of the included studies was considered average. The findings indicated that age at the time of surgery and gender did not significantly influence functional recovery after pyeloplasty. However, preoperative DRF consistently emerged as a critical predictor. Preoperative DRF can serve as the most common predictors used for renal function recovery following pyeloplasty. These findings contribute to understanding effective treatment options for chronic unilateral renal obstruction. However, further research for each predictor is needed to validate these predictors and their clinical utility. Cite this article as: Siregar S, Mustafa A, Steven S. Can we predict renal function recovery after pyeloplasty in pediatrics with ureteropelvic junction obstruction? A systematic review. Urol Res Pract. Published online March 31, 2024. DOI:10.5152/tud.2024.23220.

Identifiers

PMID38798006
PMCPMC11265535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.