Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38797845›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Youth not engaged in education, employment, or training: a discrete choice experiment of service preferences in Canada.

Meaghen Quinlan-Davidson, Mahalia Dixon, Gina Chinnery, Lisa D Hawke, Srividya Iyer, Katherine Moxness, Matthew Prebeg, Lehana Thabane, J L Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meaghen Quinlan-DavidsonCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 80 Workman Way, Toronto, ON, M6J 1H4, Canada.
Mahalia DixonCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 80 Workman Way, Toronto, ON, M6J 1H4, Canada.
Gina Chinnery, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Lisa D HawkeCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 80 Workman Way, Toronto, ON, M6J 1H4, Canada.
Srividya IyerDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Katherine MoxnessBatshaw Youth and Family Centres, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Matthew PrebegCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 80 Workman Way, Toronto, ON, M6J 1H4, Canada.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
J L HendersonCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 80 Workman Way, Toronto, ON, M6J 1H4, Canada. jo.henderson@camh.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior research has showed the importance of providing integrated support services to prevent and reduce youth not in education, employment, or training (NEET) related challenges. There is limited evidence on NEET youth's perspectives and preferences for employment, education, and training services. The objective of this study was to identify employment, education and training service preferences of NEET youth. We acknowledge the deficit-based lens associated with the term NEET and use 'upcoming youth' to refer to this population group.

methodsCanadian youth (14-29 years) who reported Upcoming status or at-risk of Upcoming status were recruited to the study. We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey, which included ten attributes with three levels each indicating service characteristics. Sawtooth software was used to design and administer the DCE. Participants also provided demographic information and completed the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs-Short Screener. We analyzed the data using hierarchical Bayesian methods to determine service attribute importance and latent class analyses to identify groups of participants with similar service preferences.

resultsA total of n=503 youth participated in the study. 51% of participants were 24-29 years of age; 18.7% identified as having Upcoming status; 41.1% were from rural areas; and 36.0% of youth stated that they met basic needs with a little left. Participants strongly preferred services that promoted life skills, mentorship, basic income, and securing a work or educational placement. Three latent classes were identified and included: (i) job and educational services (38.9%), or services that include career counseling and securing a work or educational placement; (ii) mental health and wellness services (34.9%), or services that offer support for mental health and wellness in the workplace and free mental health and substance use services; and (iii) holistic skills building services (26.1%), or services that endorsed skills for school and job success, and life skills.

conclusionsThis study identified employment, education, and training service preferences among Upcoming youth. The findings indicate a need to create a service model that supports holistic skills building, mental health and wellness, and long-term school and job opportunities.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorAdolescentAdultBayes TheoremCanadaEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDiscrete choice experimentEmploymentOr trainingService preferencesYouth mental health and substance useYouth not in education

Identifiers

PMID38797845
PMCPMC11129463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.