Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38797802›Full record

ArticlePlant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2024

Probiotic Bacteria Survival and Shelf Life of High Fibre Plant Snack - Model Study.

Marcin Kruk, Piotr Lalowski, Monika Hoffmann, Monika Trząskowska, Danuta Jaworska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Comparative Effects of Probiotics and Paraprobiotics Derived fromJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcin KrukInstitute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland. marcin_kruk@sggw.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9133-0122
Piotr LalowskiFaculty of Human Nutrition, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6982-1491
Monika HoffmannInstitute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9537-7916
Monika TrząskowskaInstitute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-463X
Danuta JaworskaInstitute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1242-5255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to develop plant-based model snacks that are high in fibre, contain probiotic bacteria and are convenient for long-term storage. The research focused on selecting a suitable form of probiotic bacteria (active biomass, microencapsulated, freeze-dried), inoculation method (in the base mass or in the filling of a snack) and appropriate storage conditions (4°Cor 20 °C). The potential synbiotic properties were evaluated. The microencapsulated bacteria had the highest survival rate at 4 °C, while the freeze-dried bacteria showed better survival rates at 20 °C. Probiotics had a higher survival rate when enclosed inside snacks with a low water activity (a

Indexed as

Dietary FiberProbioticsSnacksAntioxidantsFood StorageHumansMicrobial ViabilityPolyphenolsSynbioticsAntioxidantsDietary FiberPolyphenolsAntioxidantsbacteria survivalBy-productsNo-dairy productsProbiotic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID38797802
PMCPMC11410916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.