ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024
Single-level laminoplasty approach to selective dorsal rhizotomy with conus localization by rapid spine MRI.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhile selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) was originally described as a multilevel approach, single-level approaches are now popularized. Conus localization is beneficial for operative planning in single-level selective dorsal rhizotomy. Our approach to SDR involves minimal exposure for a single-level laminoplasty, preserving one attached interspinous ligament. Pre-operative conus localization is required for this tailored approach to determine the laminoplasty level and dictate rostral or caudal division of the superior spinus ligament. While rapid MRI sequences have been popularized for pediatric cranial imaging, its utility for spinal imagining is less well-described, and specific application for conus localization has not been reported.
objectiveIllustrate that rapid MRI without sedation is sufficient to identify conus level for tailored single-level laminoplasty SDR. MATERIAL AND
methodsPatients undergoing SDR from 2014 to 2022 at one institution were reviewed for type of pre-operative MRI (rapid vs full), conus level, procedural time for MRI, and radiology report. The typical rapid MRI has four sequences utilizing single-shot technique (scout, sagittal T2, axial T2, and axial T1) that typically take less than 1 min each of acquisition time, with non-single-shot sequences added periodically in cooperative patients. To include time for patient positioning, pre-scan shimming, procedural incidentals, and other patient-specific variations, MRI procedure length was recorded as documented in the electronic medical record.
resultsN = 100 patients had documentation of an MRI for pre-operative imaging. Seventy-nine of these had a rapid MRI, and 21 required a full MRI with anesthesia for their treatment plan. Mean total procedure time for rapid MRI was 21.5 min (median 17). Mean procedure time for MRI under general anesthesia was 91.2 min (median 94). Of patients with rapid MRI imaging, 2/79 had an ambiguous conus level (1 from motion artifact, 1 from spinal hardware) vs 1/21 with a full MRI under anesthesia (due to spinal hardware).
conclusionRapid spinal MRI without sedation can be used for conus localization in a pediatric population. This may be routinely used as pre-operative imaging for a single-level approach to selective dorsal rhizotomy, without sedation or intubation procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.