Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38797498›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2024

Enhancing Precision in Cardiac Segmentation for Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy Through Deep Learning.

Nicholas Summerfield, Eric Morris, Soumyanil Banerjee, Qisheng He, Ahmed I Ghanem, Simeng Zhu, Jiwei Zhao, Ming Dong, Carri Glide-Hurst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cardiac substructure dosimetry in thoracic radiotherapy: moving beyond mean heart dose and toward precision cardiac risk mitigation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Modality-AGnostic image Cascade (MAGIC) for multi-modality cardiac substructure segmentation.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicholas SummerfieldDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Eric MorrisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Soumyanil BanerjeeDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Qisheng HeDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Ahmed I GhanemDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; Alexandria Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Simeng ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Jiwei ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Ming DongDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Carri Glide-HurstDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: glidehurst@humonc.wisc.edu.

Funding

U.W. RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bryan Patrick Bednarz · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
Reducing cardiac toxicity with deep learning and MRI-guided radiation therapyR01HL153720 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GLIDE-HURST, CARRI KAYE · 2021 to 2024
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009206NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCardiac substructure dose metrics are more strongly linked to late cardiac morbidities than to whole-heart metrics. Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) enables substructure visualization during daily localization, allowing potential for enhanced cardiac sparing. We extend a publicly available state-of-the-art deep learning framework, "No New" U-Net, to incorporate self-distillation (nnU-Net.wSD) for substructure segmentation for MRgRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen (institute A) patients who underwent thoracic or abdominal radiation therapy on a 0.35 T MR-guided linear accelerator were retrospectively evaluated. On each image, 1 of 2 radiation oncologists delineated reference contours of 12 cardiac substructures (chambers, great vessels, and coronary arteries) used to train (n = 10), validate (n = 3), and test (n = 5) nnU-Net.wSD by leveraging a teacher-student network and comparing it to standard 3-dimensional U-Net. The impact of using simulation data or including 3 to 4 daily images for augmentation during training was evaluated for nnU-Net.wSD. Geometric metrics (Dice similarity coefficient, mean distance to agreement, and 95% Hausdorff distance), visual inspection, and clinical dose-volume histograms were evaluated. To determine generalizability, institute A's model was tested on an unlabeled data set from institute B (n = 22) and evaluated via consensus scoring and volume comparisons.

resultsnnU-Net.wSD yielded a Dice similarity coefficient (reported mean ± SD) of 0.65 ± 0.25 across the 12 substructures (chambers, 0.85 ± 0.05; great vessels, 0.67 ± 0.19; and coronary arteries, 0.33 ± 0.16; mean distance to agreement, <3 mm; mean 95% Hausdorff distance, <9 mm) while outperforming the 3-dimensional U-Net (0.583 ± 0.28; P <.01). Leveraging fractionated data for augmentation improved over a single MR simulation time point (0.579 ± 0.29; P <.01). Predicted contours yielded dose-volume histograms that closely matched those of the clinical treatment plans where mean and maximum (ie, dose to 0.03 cc) doses deviated by 0.32 ± 0.5 Gy and 1.42 ± 2.6 Gy, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between institute A and B volumes (P >.05) for 11 of 12 substructures, with larger volumes requiring minor changes and coronary arteries exhibiting more variability.

conclusionsThis work is a critical step toward rapid and reliable cardiac substructure segmentation to improve cardiac sparing in low-field MRgRT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHeartMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedAbdominal NeoplasmsHumansMaleOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesThoracic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38797498
PMCPMC11427143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.