ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2024
Resting state electroencephalographic brain activity in neonates can predict age and is indicative of neurodevelopmental outcome.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neonatal brain-age models in full- and preterm infants.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neonatal brain-age models in full- and preterm infants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Brain activity as a candidate biomarker for personalised caffeine treatment in premature neonates.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Toward automated neonatal EEG analysis: multi-center validation of a reliable deep learning pipeline.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Maturation of Neuronal Activity in the Human Cortex Exhibits Robust Spatial Gradients across the Birth Transition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- [Research progress in electroencephalogram-based brain age prediction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Review
- Pharmacological treatment for apnoea of prematurity-the need for an individualised approach.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Detection of neurologic changes in critically ill infants using deep learning on video data: a retrospective single center cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Sensory event-related potential morphology predicts age in premature infants.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveElectroencephalography (EEG) can be used to estimate neonates' biological brain age. Discrepancies between postmenstrual age and brain age, termed the brain age gap, can potentially quantify maturational deviation. Existing brain age EEG models are not well suited to clinical cot-side use for estimating neonates' brain age gap due to their dependency on relatively large data and pre-processing requirements.
methodsWe trained a deep learning model on resting state EEG data from preterm neonates with normal neurodevelopmental Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) outcomes, using substantially reduced data requirements. We subsequently tested this model in two independent datasets from two clinical sites.
resultsIn both test datasets, using only 20 min of resting-state EEG activity from a single channel, the model generated accurate age predictions: mean absolute error = 1.03 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) and 0.98 weeks (p-value = 0.0001). In one test dataset, where 9-month follow-up BSID outcomes were available, the average neonatal brain age gap in the severe abnormal outcome group was significantly larger than that of the normal outcome group: difference in mean brain age gap = 0.50 weeks (p-value = 0.04).
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that the deep learning model generalises to independent datasets from two clinical sites, and that the model's brain age gap magnitudes differ between neonates with normal and severe abnormal follow-up neurodevelopmental outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: The magnitude of neonates' brain age gap, estimated using only 20 min of resting state EEG data from a single channel, can encode information of clinical neurodevelopmental value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.