Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38797002›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Resting state electroencephalographic brain activity in neonates can predict age and is indicative of neurodevelopmental outcome.

Amir Ansari, Kirubin Pillay, Emad Arasteh, Anneleen Dereymaeker, Gabriela Schmidt Mellado, Katrien Jansen, Anderson M Winkler, Gunnar Naulaers, Aomesh Bhatt, Sabine Van Huffel and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neonatal brain-age models in full- and preterm infants.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Neonatal brain-age models in full- and preterm infants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Maturation of Neuronal Activity in the Human Cortex Exhibits Robust Spatial Gradients across the Birth Transition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. [Research progress in electroencephalogram-based brain age prediction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sensory event-related potential morphology predicts age in premature infants.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Amir AnsariDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kirubin PillayDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emad ArastehDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anneleen DereymaekerDepartment of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gabriela Schmidt MelladoDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katrien JansenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Child Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anderson M WinklerDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX, USA.
Gunnar NaulaersDepartment of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Aomesh BhattDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sabine Van HuffelDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Caroline HartleyDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Maarten De VosDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Child Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rebeccah SlaterDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Luke BaxterDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: luke.baxter@paediatrics.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207457/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 213486/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveElectroencephalography (EEG) can be used to estimate neonates' biological brain age. Discrepancies between postmenstrual age and brain age, termed the brain age gap, can potentially quantify maturational deviation. Existing brain age EEG models are not well suited to clinical cot-side use for estimating neonates' brain age gap due to their dependency on relatively large data and pre-processing requirements.

methodsWe trained a deep learning model on resting state EEG data from preterm neonates with normal neurodevelopmental Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) outcomes, using substantially reduced data requirements. We subsequently tested this model in two independent datasets from two clinical sites.

resultsIn both test datasets, using only 20 min of resting-state EEG activity from a single channel, the model generated accurate age predictions: mean absolute error = 1.03 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) and 0.98 weeks (p-value = 0.0001). In one test dataset, where 9-month follow-up BSID outcomes were available, the average neonatal brain age gap in the severe abnormal outcome group was significantly larger than that of the normal outcome group: difference in mean brain age gap = 0.50 weeks (p-value = 0.04).

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that the deep learning model generalises to independent datasets from two clinical sites, and that the model's brain age gap magnitudes differ between neonates with normal and severe abnormal follow-up neurodevelopmental outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: The magnitude of neonates' brain age gap, estimated using only 20 min of resting state EEG data from a single channel, can encode information of clinical neurodevelopmental value.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyChild DevelopmentDeep LearningFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleRestBayley ScaleBrain age gapConvolutional neural networkDeep learningElectroencephalographyInfant

Identifiers

PMID38797002
PMCPMC11250083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.