Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38796821›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

Revision of restrictive bariatric procedures in elderly patients: results at a 5-year follow-up.

Adam Abu-Abeid, Noa Gosher, Mati Shnell, Sigal Fishman, Andrei Keidar, Guy Lahat, Shai Meron Eldar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam Abu-AbeidDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel. adamabuabeid@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4607-3462
Noa GosherDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Mati ShnellDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sigal FishmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Andrei KeidarDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Guy LahatDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shai Meron EldarDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) is increasing in popularity. Elderly patients (> 65 years old) are sometimes referred for RBS evaluation. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of elderly patients undergoing RBS. A retrospective analysis of a cohort from a single-tertiary bariatric center. All elderly patients undergoing RBS after restrictive procedures between 2012 and 2022 were included. Thirty Nine patients undergoing RBS were included in the comparative analysis - 23 patients (57.5%) after adjustable gastric banding (s/p LAGB) and 16 patients (40%) after Sleeve Gastrectomy (s/p SG). The mean age and body mass index (BMI) of patients were comparable (67.2 ± 2.8 years and 38.3 ± 7.4, respectively). There was no difference in associated medical problems except reflux which was higher in s/p SG (68% vs. 13%; p < 0.001). The mean time interval between surgeries was 8.7 ± 5.1 years. The surgeries included One anastomosis gastric bypass (n = 22), SG (n = 8) and Roux-en-y gastric bypass (n = 9). Early major complication rates were comparable (4.3% and 12.5%; p = 0.36), and readmission rate was higher in patients s/p SG (p = 0.03). Ninety percent of patients were available to a follow-up of 59.8 months. The mean BMI and total weight loss was 29.2 and 20.3%, respectively with no difference between groups. The rate of patients with associated medical problems at last follow-up was significantly reduced. Five patients (12.5%) underwent revisional surgery due to complications during follow-up. In conclusion, RBS in the elderly is associated with a reasonable complication rate and is effective in terms of weight loss and improvement of associated medical problems in a 5-year follow-up.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryReoperationAgedAge FactorsBody Mass IndexFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastroplastyHumansMaleObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWeight LossElderlyLong-term weight lossMetabolic and bariatric surgeryRevisional bariatric surgerySafety

Identifiers

PMID38796821
PMCPMC11628429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.